30 November 2009

Ageing stupidly

It would be nice if I was a totally rationale machine that behaved like neoclassical economists think we should.  I'm not.

Here are the things that I noted at the time and was consciously aware they meant that I was getting older.  While there have been many other markers these are the ones where I thought- 'I'm getting older'.

- wearing short trousers with the pocket at the back, not at the front; 3? under 5 anyway

- getting a watch; 10 years

- sex; 18 years old

- getting into debt; 18 years old

- finally understanding what a draught was (up until then I never understood why adults complained about doors left open in warm rooms); somewhere near 20

- buying emery boards (yep weird); about 30

- my first grey hair; 35

- arranging my father's funeral and having to explain to my aunt that she wasn't making the decisions; 41

- the sudden realisation that I actually know a hell of a lot less than I thought I did about a huge range of things  (people, life, talent, right, money etc...); January 09

 

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous

23 November 2009

3 steps backwards

A friend of mine told me he had an example of technology going backwards in our lifetimes. While not wanting to portray the gradiose idea that civilisation is moving backwards I've added two more to the list. 

 

  1. Mike's example was Concorde. When the last Concorde was shelved we moved to slower passenger travel across the Atlantic passing over a faster service
  2. Cellphones in cars.   While not in anyway encouraging use of cellphones while driving the benefit of texting or ringing to say 'I'm running late' while stuck at the lights has been closed to us. On Friday I sat on the great southern carpark, in as rental car, leaving Auckland (long story email me if this un- Sam location interests you) , and while not moving and I stared at my ringing cellphone. The nearby police car was a strong reminder of this new policy, but as we weren't moving I felt more than a little frustrated. Yes I know you can pull over but a) the Great Southern Carpark has a very long no stopping zone b) if you're late pulling over and light stops just seems a bit much. In my case - rental cars are hard to rig a legitmate cell phone holding devices in and the messages were urgent and my inability to respond has caused a bit of trouble.
  3. Mudguards.  I see many cyclists, including school kids, riding around with huge mud trails up their backs. It's no suprise the big thick tyres are made to pump water off the surface and fling it up. So we've abandoned mudguards on bicycles and people are getting their clothes, hair and bags covered in mud so that IF the bike is taken off road into a large ruddy mudpuddle it won't jam the chunky back wheel. So very expense bikes that look like the more expensive BMX cycles built to off-road but only used for nice urban streets.  It's almost like these pristine urban tractors (4 wheel drives) running around our city - ostensibly designed for one use and now instead a status symbol for people with .... (better stop there- some of my best friends have 4wDs)

Any other examples?

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous

22 November 2009

Getting married brings £18,000 worth of happiness to men – but only half that to women - Telegraph

By Kate Devlin
Published: 7:00AM GMT 17 Nov 2009

Wedding bells provide only around £9,000 worth of joy to women, a new study suggests.

The differences between the sexes continue even when it comes to divorce.

Men are so devastated by the break up of a marriage that it feels as though they have lost £61,500.

For women, however, the pain is less traumatic – and leaves them feeling as if they had lost only a measly £5,000.

The sums are estimates of the value in cash terms of the happiness that a marriage brings.

They have been calculated by estimating how much money a person would have to receive in a lump sum to bring the same amount of joy.

Paul Frijters, an Australian university professor, has spent the last eight years following the effect of major life events on 10,000 people.

He said: "These are real people to whom unexpected things happen.

"They were not selected because these things would happen and, because of that, we can accurately compare their happiness before and after."

The volunteers were asked to rate how satisfied they were with their lives on a scale of 0 to 10.

The most common number given was eight.

However, the ratings changed after, and sometimes in anticipation of, life-altering events, including sudden changes in income.

These changes allowed Prof Frijters, from the Queensland University of Technology, to assign cash values to the happiness created by events such as marriage, divorce and illness.

He found that expectant parents were happier in the build up to their child’s birth.

However, within months they were slightly less happy than they would have been if they had not had children.

Correspondingly, the birth of a child scores a low cash sum, more than £18,000 for a man and just under £5,000 for a woman.

The findings also show that we feel the loss of a loved one more keenly than finding new love.

Paul Frijters said: "Losing a loved one has a much bigger effect than gaining a loved one.

“There's a real asymmetry between life and death.

"This shouldn't surprise us.

“Human beings seem primed to notice losses more than gains."

The death of a partner or a child creates the feeling of a loss of £73,000 to a woman and more than £350,000 to a man, according to the findings.

Prof Frijters cautioned: "This isn't the value of the life that's lost, that would be much higher, of course.

"This is just the effect on the happiness of one person flowing from a death."

He said he did not know why major life events appeared to have different effects on men than women.

"But it does tend to give me confidence in the calculations,” he said.

"We know for instance that marriage improves the lives of men much more than women."

Some of the other findings appear to fit with stereotypes of the different sexes.

For example, women feel a boost of around £1,500 when they move house, while men feel a loss of around £9,000 during the same move.

Prof Frijters said that his calculations suggest that money has a greater effect on happiness than has previously been thought.

The worth of major life events

Marriage

Man – £17,675.68

Woman – £8,726.25

Birth of child

Man – £18,236.39

Woman – £4,866.77

Divorce

Man – loss of £61,116.46

Woman – loss of £4,977.08

Death of a loved one

Man – loss of £350,830.36

Woman – loss of £73,204.86

Illness

Man – loss of £201,264.68

Woman – loss of £28,124.61

Moving home

Man – loss of 8,947.11

Woman – £1,453.80

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous

21 November 2009

Split personality

This is a cry for help.  Yes I do want advice and suggestions. Normally I don't, and I just want to be right.

Okay with that out of the way.

Some years ago I changed from writing novels to plays.  It made sense.  I'm a crap novelist, everyone raved about my dialogue, and I've done a lot of theatre.  So I switched back to plays (I used to write them when I was in my teens). What I did discover though is that people were very keen to pick holes in what I'd written and re-write it for me as we rehearsed. In fact it was very hard work I ended up arguing with actors.

Enter Tim Barcode. An invention. I did spread the rumour that he may be from Melbourne.  From then on, no one even questioned the text, they just got down and worked on the plays. So from 1995 till about 2005 the prolific Barcode produced my best work.  I discovered that I liked people not knowing who he was AND Barcode could say things I couldn't. He wasn't as PC as I am and he was also smarter. He was almost a dangerous intellectual.

Then came the play Real and the support from Playmarket.  Playmarket gave me a lot of help getting Real ready for perfomance, particularly read throughs and then a funded workshop. the support was fantastic.  A condition was that it had to be under my name not Barcode. One reason was I wouldn't be taken seriously.  So Sam Fisher started writing the plays. Now the problem is, or may be, they're not as good.  BUT I have a body of work by Barcode, a series of plays by my given name and I've even got some down as co-authored.

As an interesting aside - 'Sam Fisher' is trademarked based on the game Splinter Cell arising from a Tom Clancy novel.Apparently I'm an ex Navy seal with a colourful past.  Who knew?  Tim Barcode is mine and mine alone and URL I own is www.timbarcode.com.

I'm leaning towards going back to Barcode but the whole personal brand thing has just got very confusing. I could maybe just buckle down and just write and not worry about it. Maybe.  Whatever I need to just make a decision and go with it.

So do I stick with Sam, follow the co-authoring path, or revert to Barcode?

So as I started - HELP (that is the cry) - Thoughts, abuse, suggestions for good psychologists, psychotherapists or pharmaceuticals?

 

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous

11 November 2009

Deep dark secrets

I'm sure we all have them. Things we don't tell people or admit. There may be many reasons; we can't reconcile them with our image, we don't think friends will like them or understand, legal reasons maybe, or whatever.  In one organisation I am a member of there is a saying we're as sick as our secrets. the corollary being 'the truth will set us free' (apologies to whoever wrote that bit in the bible but I am sure we're out of copyright now).

I'm off to Hanmer for 3 days and I feel like explaining why.

When I first joined Facebook I did a quiz, 'how geeky are you?' I don't see myself as particularly geeky, I can't programme, I don't like Star Trek or Lord of the Rings and I don't own a blue anorak.  I was stunned to fly through the questions and score a rating of more geeky than any of my friends who had done the quiz and 75% of Facebook users.  This was perhaps the first inkling of the issue. This year, after a series of major changes in my life in 08 I decided I needed to meet more people and get back to doing things I love. 

I immediately rejected salsa dancing (I'm a male and I have a partner), cricket (which takes hours and hours and hours and I'm crap anyway), and getting back into politics (I'd rather have my head superglued to a Holden).

This weekend I am off to a board game weekend.  Most Wednesdays this year I have been playing board games, I love them, have done since I was small. I used to invent them.  And the idea of spending four days playing lots of them really appeals. This isn't monopoly the game of life or Cluedo, but Eurogames; high-end strategy and complicated multi-objective board games.  I'm even a member and patron on Boardgamegeek.com.  I browse catalogues and watch videos on board game reviews.

Why do I love boardgames?  They're social, the people who play them are interesting (and almost all are intelligent), and you have to think.

But the most interesting thing I think is that it addresses one of life's great issues. Life is very complicated, it can be very unfair and often is.  Your best efforts are sometimes not good enough, and other times you have incredible luck. I always wonder sometimes where the rule book is.  With board games the variables are all defined and controlled; how much luck, how much skill are all quantified and controlled. If someone has an unfair run of luck it will be evened out. You can learn and improve.  You can make a hash out of a situation and make bad decisions and at the end start again. 

And people also play games with the same approach to how they live. When you get experienced you can work to adjust your playing style. This isn't just true of games.  I noticed it when I worked in a supermarket when I was studying; the way people approached their work was exactly how they approached everything else in their lives (work, problems, study, relationships...).

I like games them as they can take you to other places and scenarios, there are thousands of modern games, and a huge industry churning out board games on just about anything you can think of.

Board games are metaphors and they are a metaphor in themselves.

Now as with all deep dark secrets some of you will never think well of me again. Some may smirk. Or say what a freak. Some will say - that's interesting. Others might want to give games a try. I'd ask - Is how you react the way you often to react to new things? And that is why board games are really good for learning about yourself.

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous

Slate Magazine

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous

08 November 2009

Doonesbury@Slate - Daily Dose

Doonesbury on Twitter. here's the whole cartoon. I hope.

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous

07 November 2009

Today's Pictures: Berlin, Berlin

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous

Doonesbury tweets Slate Magazine

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous

the sound of lawnmowers

There are some evocative phrases that put me straight into a place or mood - literary shorthand maybe.  Paul Simon's 'sound of a train in the distance' is one.

Right now I can hear lawnmowers... that is one that when I read I immediately go to a kiwi front lawn on a hot day. But I also can add my cousins house by the pool where there were deck chairs or my father in his terrible brown shorts looking uncomfortable in the sun at Christmas in the late 70s.

Trains in the distance was Paul Simon's way of saying things can get better.  The sound of lawnmowers says to me we're already there if we just stop and realise it.

Posted via email from SamNZed's posterous

06 November 2009

The end of hot showers

One of the more unsettling things I've seen on TV in the last year is people reducing the flow on their showers.

I've chosen flats and houses for years with shower effectiveness as a showstopping criteria. I've seen it as a height of civilisation to have a lovely hot shower where I get very wet. the idea of reducing shower effectiveness feels to me like the march of civilisation into darkness.Now I know if I lived in Australia or one of many other water-poor nations I couldn't have a long shower so if I lived there I'd be a poorer dirtier individual but thankfully I live in New Zild - the '0.65ha low fat instant pudding paradise'

This water and power profligacy has it's roots in my dysfunctional childhood where after my parents broke up I lived in a house with my mother, no hot water but a small cylinder and wetback that, if we had a fire, produced two short showers and the dishes once a day. Such was the dysfunction that if I as a 10 year old didn't clear the grate, find wood and light the fire there was no hot water. Since I didn't enjoy the grate clearing and often couldn find things to burn, I didn't always do it.  So when we visited relatives my 2 siblings and I were stripped, thrown into baths and our clothes washed (or thrown out and replaced as happened occassionally).

When I turn 13 and went to High School I suddenly understood cleanliness so started to ensure there was a fire and hot water and I had a brief shower each morning. Since I was getting myself too school it was also something to encourage me to get me up in the morning in time to forage some lunch and sometimes breakfast and get to school on time. My shower time was the best time of the day. And that feeling has continued to today - showers to me have a deep cleansing and liberating function, one that means I can hold my head up high and go out. You can imagine my classmates were far more friendly when I showered every day compared to once a fortnight (and had clean clothes which is another story).

So recognising my showers are now seen by many as the enemy of the planet I have gone back to one every other day and sometimes one every 3 days but they are hot and long. I do have a problem with this idea of who can prescribe what I can use energy for and what I can't.  If I was choosing I'd close all gyms (make people run around instead and save that power), but many would object to this. I'd also cancel the world cup rugby - that has to be worth a lot of hot showers, and actually all rugby in those big stadiums with lights. let the teams flail around in the dark OR play when it's light. I'd close TV networks during daylight hours, close schools and workplaces on very hot and very cold days. Demand offices use less air conditioning (all it does is make people sick anyway). Ban SUVs for ordinary households. I'd ban a lot of overseas travel. I'd impoverish Paris Hilton - a big waste of energy there I think. But I wouldn't interfere with other peoples' showers.

For my shower I will trade all sorts of other energy and water consumption. I will hand wash rather than dish wash. I will not buy a swimming pool (sorry kids). I will wander around in the dark more. Eat more uncooked food dishes. Not go out as much.  I will wear poly props and leave the heater off. I will trade off a lot of things before my showers.

And if I am ever very rich I will forgo a big car and a private plane.  And I will have a wasteful hot shower every day.

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous

Zuckerberg's law

Zuckerberg's law - the tendency over time for successful social media sites to change how they work and make things steadily less useful. (see FB site changes, Twitter Feed changes etc...)

Posted via web from SamNZed's posterous